B.N.KIRPAL, ARUN KUMAR
MADAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR, DELHI HIGH COURT – Respondent
( 1 ) THE challenge in this writ petition is to the non-fixation of the pay of the petitioner pursuant to the report of the Foutti Pay Commi- ssion.
( 2 ) THE petitioner in Class-IV employee of this Court and is working as an Usher in the pay-scale of Rs. 30u-43u. This petition appears to have been filed in a representative capacity on behalf of all the Class-1 V employees of this Court, who are Peons, crashes, Safai-Walas, Daftries, Jamadars, Junior Library Attendants, Records Sorters and Junior Gestetner Operators. This judgment will, therefore, be applicable to all these and other Class-IV employees of this Court.
( 3 ) PRIOR to the Third Pay Commission Report, these employees were in the pay-scales ranging from Rs. 196-232 to Rs. 210-270. The petitioner herein filed a Civil Writ Petition No. 2236/86, inter alia, praying that the pay of Class-IV employees of this Court should be fixed in the pay-scale of Rs. 300-430 inasmuch as similar employees in the High Court of Punjabi Haryana were drawing their salaries in this pay-scale of Rs. 300-430.
( 4 ) THE aforesaid petition was allowed by this Court vide Judgment dated 4th December, 1986. The Union of India filed a Spec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.