S.C.JAIN
KANWAR KUMAR SETH – Appellant
Versus
MULKH RAJ MALHOTRA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE facts giving rise to this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India are that the petitioner had filed a petition for eviction dated 24. 2. 86, against the respondent under Section 14 (l) (a) (b) (c) (j) of the Delhi Rent Control Act. As non payment of rent is one of the grounds of eviction, an order under Section 15 (1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act was passed on 7. 7. 87 by the Addl. Rent Controller directing the respondent to pay or deposit the entire arrears of rent @ Rs. 90. 00 per month from 1. 7. 85 upto date within one month from the date of the order and to continue to pay or deposit the future rent month by month by the 15th of each succeeding month. In compliance with that order the respondent deposited the arrears of rent w. e f. 1. 7. 85 to 31. 7. 86 @ 90. 00 p. m. on 48. 87 i. e. within one month of the date of the order.
( 2 ) THE petitioner was not satisfied with the order of the Addl. Rent Controller, as according to him, the Addl. Rent Controller should have ordered to deposit the rent @ Rs. 97. 00 am. and not @ Rs. 90. 00 and so he filed an appeal before the Rent Control Tribunal challenging the order of the Addl. Rent Contr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.