( 1 ) THIS is a second appeal filed against the judgment of Shri O. P. Divedi, Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi dated 29th January, 1990 whereby he conflimed the findings that the respondent herein needs the premises in dispute bonafide for his residence and the members of his family dependent upon him and the appellant, Om Parkash has acquired vacant possession of House No. E-19, Adarsh Nagar, Delhi after 1978.

( 2 ) IN brief the facts of the case are that Vaid Shyam Sunder-respondent herein alleged in his eviction petition that he being the owner/landlord of the suit premises let out the same to the appellant for residential purposes and that he requires the same bonafide for his residence and for the residence of his family members dependent upon him and that he has co other suitable residental accommodation for his residence and for the residence of the members of his family at Delhi. The other ground of eviction, which the respondent/ landlord has taken is that the appellant has constructed a residential house E-19, Adarsh Nagar, Delhi in 1978, after the commencement of the tenancy and that he is also liable to be evicted under the provisions of Section 14-1 (h) of