SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 631

ARUN KUMAR, B.N.KIRPAL
JASVIR KAUR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.G.Seth, NEMO K.PARASARAN

B. N. KIRPAL, J. (ORAL)

( 1 ) THE petitioner is seeking to challenge the decision of the Customs. authorities as well as the Joint Secretary to the Government of India whereby two Gold Karas weighing 110 grams, valued at Rs. 20,900. 00 were not allowed to be re-exported.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts are that the petitioner arrived at I G. I. Airport from abroid and was carrying on her person Gold in the from of two crude Karas. She did not declare these Karas and, according to the impugned orders, she tried to go through the Green Channel and when she was intercepted at the exit gate as to whether she was carrying any Gold, she answered in the negative. Apparently the Customs authorities did recover the two Gold Karas and the same were confiscated and a penally of Rs. 1500. 00 was imposed.

( 3 ) AN appeal was filed and it was contended that the impugned orders were contrary to the Tourist Baggage Rules. The submission was that the Karas should be allowed to be re-exported and penalty refunded. It was held by the Appellate Authority that the two Gold articles were examined by him and be had found that the same were not normal Karas but were strips of Gold whose ends had been joined












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top