SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 700

S.C.JAIN
NARAIN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MAHINDER SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NANDINI SAHNI, Narinder Sethi, SANJAY PODDAR

S. C. Jain

( 1 ) FACTS giving rise to this civil contempt petition are that Narain Singh, petitioner herein, filed a suit for permanent injunction in the Court of the Addl. District Judge Delhi seeking injunction against the respondents Mahinder Singh and Rajinder Singh restraining them from interfering in any manner in the peaceful possession of the petitioner on the piece of land measuring 2 bighas, 18 biswas in Khasra No. 6/19/2 situated in village Samaipur, Delhi. In that suit, an application for temporary injunction was also filed. Shri M. S. Rohilla, Addl. District Judge vide order dated 11. 6. 1990 granted ex parte injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the possession of the petitioner on the suit land, but on an application moved by the respondents under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC, the Addl. District Judge, Mrs. Manju Goel, vide her detailed order dated 29. 6. 1990 vacated the stay order and dismissed the application filed by the petitioner holding, prima facie, that the petitioner is neither In possession nor has title over the suit land. That order was challenged by the petitioner by filing an appeal before this Court.

( 2 ) IN this contempt petition filed b








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top