SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 102

CHARANJIT TALWAR, S.N.SAPRA
GOODYEAR INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAJENDER DUTT, RAVINDER NARAYAN

S. N. Sapra, J.

( 1 ) BY the present writ petition, petitioners seek to, interalia, challenge the Directive No. 15/16/63-CXI of the Central Board of Excise and Customs, respondent no. 2 herein, whereby it has been clarified that, where an exemption of set off is given under the notification, the special duty of excise is to be calculated first, without applying the exemption notification, which is to be applied thereafter.

( 2 ) TO appreciate the respective contentions of learned counsel for parties, it will be useful, to refer to, in briefs, the facts of the case.

( 3 ) PETITIONER No. 1 manufactures tyres, tubes, flaps and rubber products, which are classifiable under Tariff Items 16, 16a and 68 of the 1st Schedule to the Central Excise and Salt, 1944, hereinafter referred to as the Act. In the manufacture of finished products, petitioner Company uses certain raw materials, which are classified and, on which duty is paid under Tariff Item 68 of the 1st Schedule to the Act. Petitioner, also uses synthetic rubber, carbon black and rubber processing chemicals, in the manufacture of rubber products. These products, are, hereinafter, referred to as the inputs.

( 4 ) ON June 4, 1979 the

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top