SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 80

N.N.GOSWAMY
RAJ RANI – Appellant
Versus
ROOPKUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MAEHSVAR DAYAL, Sarvagya Sharma

N. N. Goswami, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the wife is directed againat the judgment and decree dated 7-10-1989 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, whereby the marriage between the parties was dissolved under Section 13 (B) (ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

( 2 ) THE admitted facts are that the parties were married at Delhi on 19-2-1988. They lived together for few days and parted company on March 7, 1988. Since that date they have been living separately. Having realised that due to their temperament they could not live together they entered into an agreement to dissolve the marriage through Court. In the agreement it was provided that the same had been arrived at with the helpand intervention of respectable and common well wishers. It was further provided that the parties will approach the Court and file a petition for divorce by mutual consent. It was also provided that a sum of Rs. 90,000. 00 had been received by the appellant wife from the respondent in consideration of the articles of dowry, future maintenance due to the wife and also by way of expenditure on litigation etc. It is not disputed that this amount was duly received and the receipt executed by the ap




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top