SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 200

SUNANDA BHANDARE
VED VRATA – Appellant
Versus
MADAN LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Bhasin, R.K.Anand, R.K.MAKHIJA, S.C.Gulati

Sunanda Bhandare, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal filed by the landlord against the judgment of the Rent Control Tribunal dated 8th September, 1983 whereby the judgment of the Controller dated 7th August, 1985 was confirmed and the execution petition filed by the landlord was dismissed and objections filed by the respondent were allowed. The landlord let out the premises to the respondent under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act for a period of 3 years from 15th July, 1978. The period of tenancy expired on 15th July 1981. Therespondent,however,did not vacate the premises as agreed to by him and therefore the appellant-landlord filed the execution petition. In reply to the execution petition, the respondent-tenant stated that the landlord bad obtained the permission from the Additional Rent Controller for letting out the premises for,a limited period by playing fraud on the Court and by suppressing true facts.

( 2 ) APART from the objection regarding the letting purpose and the alleged fresh tenancy created in favour of the respondent-tenant after the period bad expired, it is stated in the objection petition that the landlord had not stated reasons in his application seeking permi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top