SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 195

MAHINDER NARAIN
ESCORTS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SAI AUTOS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.VIR, H.R.Arora, Sanjay Lamba

Mahinder Narain, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, having its registered office at H-2, Connaught Circus New Delhi, has filed this suit for recovery of Rs. 3,38,916. 00 against four defendants.

( 2 ) DEFENDANT No. 1 is M/s. Sai Autos; defendant No. 2 is Mr. K. Neela Mohan Rao, partner and proprietor of M/s. Sai Autos. Defendant No 3 Sri Y. Venkateswar Rao is also partner and proprietor of M/s. Sai Autos and defendant No. 4 is Mr. Bollam Venkatramaiah.

( 3 ) M/s. Sai Auto are stated to have been dealers at Karim Nagar (Andhra Pradesh) for the sale of Ford Tractors made by the plaintiff company.

( 4 ) IT is the case of the plaintiff company that Mr. Charanjit Singh who has signed and verified the plaint, is the Principal Officer as also the Vice-President arid Secretary of the plaitiff company, and. is authorised to sign verify the plaint and file the. present suit and to prosecute the same on behalf of the plaintiff company in terms of the General Power of Attorney dated 28th January, 1966 granted to him by the plaintiff company, and registered in the books and records of the Sub Registrar New Delhi at No. 164 in Additional Book No. 4, Volume N

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top