SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 228

P.K.BAHRI
PRAKASH WATI – Appellant
Versus
DAYAWANTI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.S.AHLUVALIA, PINKY ANAND

P. K. Bahri, J.

( 1 ) THIS suit is at the admission stage. Counsel for the plaintiff was called upon to satisfy this Court whether proper court fee has been paid on the various reliefs claimed in this suit. The plaintiff has claimed the following reliefs in this suit

(A) pass a permanent decree for partition of the suit property mentioned in Para I and more specifically detailed in the plain attached alongwith the plaint declaring the shares of the plaintiff which is l/6th; (b) a Local Commissioner be appointed to suggest a mode of parti- tion of the suit property by metes and bounds; (c) after submitting the report of the Local Commissioner, a final decree for partition be passed delineating and separating the share of the plaintiff in the suit property ; (d) pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining defendant No. I from preventing the use, occupation and possession of the suit property by the plaintiff; (e) grant permanent injunction restraining defendant No. I from selling, mortgaging, transferring and/encumbering the suit pro- perty in any manner without the consent of the plaintiff and defendants 2 to 5 ; (f ) costs of these proceedings be awarded to the plaintiff; (g)




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top