SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 279

ARUN B.SAHARYA
ANGELO FERNANDES – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK AGARWAL, R.K.WATEL, S.L.VATEL

A. B. SAHARYA

( 1 ) BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged a notification dated 4th of April 1964 under Section 4, a declaration dated 7th of December 1966 under Section 6 and notice dated 8th of June 1967 under Section 9 of the Delhi Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in respect of land in perpetual tenancy of the petitioner, bearing Khasra No. 19 min, measuring 99 bighas 4 bighas in Village Okhala. By anadditional affidavit, placing on record certain subtequent events, the petitioner has also claimed a declaration that the entire proceedings for the. acquisition of the land have lapsed.

( 2 ). In pursuance of the notifitanon under Section 4, followed by the declaration under Section 6 and the notice dated 8th of June 1967, the petitioner filed, within the time allowed for that purpose, objections and claim to compensation under Section 9 of the Act, Thereafter, no proceedings were held. The petitioner was not notified of ariy progress despite reminders dated 22nd of February 1971, 19th of April 1972 and 6th of December 1979 (Annexure P-l to P-III respectively to the wirt petition ).

( 3 ). In Oct





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top