ARUN B.SAHARYA
ANGELO FERNANDES – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged a notification dated 4th of April 1964 under Section 4, a declaration dated 7th of December 1966 under Section 6 and notice dated 8th of June 1967 under Section 9 of the Delhi Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in respect of land in perpetual tenancy of the petitioner, bearing Khasra No. 19 min, measuring 99 bighas 4 bighas in Village Okhala. By anadditional affidavit, placing on record certain subtequent events, the petitioner has also claimed a declaration that the entire proceedings for the. acquisition of the land have lapsed.
( 2 ). In pursuance of the notifitanon under Section 4, followed by the declaration under Section 6 and the notice dated 8th of June 1967, the petitioner filed, within the time allowed for that purpose, objections and claim to compensation under Section 9 of the Act, Thereafter, no proceedings were held. The petitioner was not notified of ariy progress despite reminders dated 22nd of February 1971, 19th of April 1972 and 6th of December 1979 (Annexure P-l to P-III respectively to the wirt petition ).
( 3 ). In Oct
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.