SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 379

P.N.NAG
DENA BANK – Appellant
Versus
BLNDAL CONSTRUCTION (PRIVATE) LIMITED. DEFENDANT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.Bhatia, SURUCHI AGARWAL

P. N. NAG, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) IN this application under Order 12. Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 1908. the plaintiff has prayed for passing a decree on the basis of admission of the suit amount.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff has filed this suit for recovery of Rs. 21,76,110. 39 with pendente lite and future interest. According to the plaintiff, the defendants in the written statement in reply to paragraphs 19 and 20 of the plaint, while admitting that loans and advances were availed of by them. stated that there was no mala fide intention on. behalf of the defendants in being irregular in the matter of payment of advances made. It was also stated in these paras that it is only due to financial constraints that the defendants were compelled to be irregular in the matter of accounts. It has been admitted by the defendants that they have every desire to return the correct amount to the plaintiff. Further, the plaintiff has stated that admission/denial of documents carried out by the defurrdants in January, 1990, Balance Confirmation dated 31-7-1981, wherein debts upto 30-6-1981 have been acknowledged by the defendants, has been admitted on behalf of the defendants I to 6. From the above, th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top