SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 374

M.K.CHAWLA, ARUN KUMAR
ESCORTS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMRITA MITTAL, RAVINDER NARAYAN, V.K.Makhija

M. K. Chawla, J.

( 1 ) THE issue involved in the present writ petition relates to deposit of the amount of impugned demand as a condition precedent to hearing of appeals before the Collector (Appeals ). The facts leading to the filing of this petition are that during the relevant period of 31-7-87 to 6-1-88, i. e. the period covered by the impugned order of the Assistant Collector, dated 28-11-89, motorcycle were cleared ex-factory for sales in the wholesale price which was available with the respondent within the meaning of sec. 4 (l) (a) of the Central Excise and Salt Act. 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). Apart from the ex- factory sales on wholesale price, the petitioners also sold motor- cycles in retail through their depot in Ghaziabad and in some cases from the factory to various customers all over India. The petitioners case is that once the ex-factory wholesale price is available. the same would be applicable to all clearances made from the factory and, therefore, it is not permissible in law to determine the assessable value with regard the sales in retail on a different basis. In other words, the assessable value in respect of the sales made in retail would al


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top