SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 421

P.K.BAHRI
NEHRU PLACE HOTELS – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.NIGAM, ARUN JAITLEY, D.N.Sawhney, Harish Malhotra, L.R.GUPTA, Mahinder Singh Dahiya, V.K.Seth

P. K. Bahri

( 1 ) [ed. facts : In 1976 the plaintiff bought a large plot of land from DDA fur construction of Nehru Place Hotels. For more than 4 years its plans were not being passed on one excuse or the other and the pff. filed a W. P. in High Court which was allowed. The DDA appealed against the same which was dismissed and the D. B. decision is briefly reported at 1983. Rajdhani L. R. 662. The detailed facts mentioned therein are not being repeated and same may be referred to. After that decision pff. applied for sanction of his plans. After lengthy correspondence, frequent meetings and repeated objections the pff. was allowed to build 2 separate blocks for commercial use and the main building of the hotel. Pff. completed the 2 blocks and repeatedly asked high and low concerned to issue the occupancy certificates in respect of the same and on failure filed W. P. in which notice was duly issued to DDA. Afterword pff. withdrew the W. P. on the ground that it intended to file a civil suit and then filed this suit, Pff. applied for interim mandatory injunction that the DDA should issue O. C. and DESU should supply electricity etc. DDA raised a prelimi- nary objectiont hat the suit w



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top