SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 413

D.P.WADHWA
USHA MALHOTRA – Appellant
Versus
GS UPPAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN MOHAN, B.P.AGRAWAL, B.R.SABHARWAL, Y.D.NAGAR

D. P. Wadlma

( 1 ) BY this order, I propose to dispose of (i) a petition filed u/s. 20 of the Arbitration Act (the act ), it being Suit No. 453-A of 1986, by Gurbaksh Singh Uppal and his wife Smt. Raj Kaur Uppal ( uppals ), the two petitioners against the sole respondent, Smt. Usha Malhotra, and (ii) an application, being I. A. 5831 of 1989, u/s. 34 of the Act, filed again by Uppals, the defendants in a suit (Suit No. 2354 of 1988) for specific performance of an agreement to sell filed by Usha Malhotra.

( 2 ) THE disputes between the parties concern property No. A-14/4, Vasant Vihar. The plot which measures 413 square Yards was held on perpetual leasehold basis by Uppals from a Society which had developed the colony. In fact, the society was the lessee, with the President of India as the lessor, and the Uppals as the sub-lessees. In the petitions, Uppals say that since under the sub-lease they were required to erect a building they, with that view, entered into an agreement of construction dated 1. 8. 1978 with Usha Malhotra. Under this agreement, a sum of Rs. 42,000. 00 was deposited by Usha Malhotra with Uppals. Certain terms of the construction agreement have then been set out in












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top