( 1 ) HAVE heard arguments for deciding the application. The plaintiff, who is one of the directors of the defendant/company, has filed this suit seeking decree for declaration to the effect that the defendant- respondent has no power to reject and/or refuse the appointment of Mr. Brij. Anand as an alternate director to the plaintiff and in the alternative a decree for declaration that the rejection of Mr. Brij Anand as an alternate director to the plaintiff is wholly, invalid, arbitrary and for declaration that the resolution passed by the Board of Directors of the respondent in October, 1988 in this respect is illegal and invalid and a relief of mandatory injunction is sought requiring the respondent to appoint Mr. Brij Anand alternate director to the plaintiff. Alongwith the suit the plaintiff bad moved an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking interim injunction restraining the respondent from implementing the decision taken in any resolution passed in the meeting dated October 24,1988 and requiring the respondent-company to ensure that the plaintiff is duly represented on the Board s meetings thro