High Court Of Delhi
SAFDARJUNG ENCLAVE EDUCATIONAL SOCY. - Appellant
Versus
DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPN. - Respondent
CIV.WRIT PETITION 263 of 1989
Decided On : 02/09/1989
TAXATION - GENERAL TAX - EXEMPTION - CHARITABLE PURPOSE - SOCIETY RUNNING SCHOOL - NO VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS - NO EXEMPTION FROM GENERAL TAX.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner society, running a school, challenged the order of the Deputy Assessor and Collector, assessing it to general tax under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. The society claimed exemption under sub-s. (4) of S. 115 of the Act, arguing that it was a charitable purpose society.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the school was generating income for the petitioner society and no amount whatsoever was being spent by the petitioner society on the school. The court also observed that the petitioner society was being run purely on commercial lines for the purpose of profits and it was in receipt of income generated from this activity in the form of building fund and donations etc., which were forced on the students and their guardians. Thus, there was no voluntary contribution.
Issues: Whether the petitioner society was entitled to exemption from general tax under sub-s. (4) of S. 115 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner society was not entitled to exemption from general tax under sub-s. (4) of S. 115 of the Act as it was not supported wholly or in part by voluntary contributions. The court relied on the decision in New Delhi Holy Hospital Society v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi, (1974) 10 DLT 39, which held that in order to qualify for the relief given by S. 115 (4) of the Act there must be present the concept of public benefit.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition.
( 1 ) THE petitioner, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act 1860, is challenging the order dt. 4-11-1988 of the Deputy Assessor and Collector, passed under the provisions of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 1957 (for short the Act ) and assessing the society to general tax. The Deputy Assessor and Collector rejected the contention of the petitioner society that no tax could be levied on its building as it was a society for a charitable purpose and entitled to exemption under sub-s. (4) of S. 115 of the Act.
( 2 ) THE society runs a school called the Green Field School and the tax in question has been levied on the school building.
( 3 ) A general tax is levied under cl. (d) of sub-s. (1) of S. 114 of the Act. The petitioner society contends that no general tax under the Act could be levied as it was exempt from any such taxation under sub-s. (4) of S. 115 of the Act. It appears that against the impugned order, a suit was also filed which was withdrawn "with liberty to take action before the forum which is competent to hear the subject-matter of the amount involved in the present case".
( 4 ) RELEVANT portion of S. 115 (4) of the Act may be reproduced as under :-
" (4) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, the general tax shall be levied in respect of all lands and buildings in Delhi except- (a) lands and buildings or portions of lands and buildings exclusively occupied and used for public worship or by a society or body for a charitable purpose; provided that such society or body is supported wholly or in part by voluntary contributions, applies its profits, if any, or other income in promoting its objects and does not pay any dividend or bonus to its members. Explanation.- "charitable purpose" includes relief of the poor, education and medical relief but does not include a purpose which relates exclusively to religious teaching;". Mr. Bhasin, learned counsel for the petitioner society, submitted that the petitioner society was running a school which was a charitable purpose as given in the Explanation and that it was applying its profits and all its income on running of the school. He stated that a similar writ petition had been admitted by another Bench of this Court, it being C. W. P. No. 2835/88 entitled Kamla Nehru College v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi. We have gone through the record of that writ petition, and we find that case is entirely different from the one before us. In that case, the petitioner college was established by the Delhi Administration. It was run by a society registered under the Societies Registration Act and was an independent legal entity. It was an affiliated college of the Delhi University and it was run entirely with the grants given by the University Grants Commission and the Delhi Administration.
( 5 ) AT our instance, Mr. Bhasin brought on record the balance-sheets of the school for the years 1981 to 1987-88 and that of the society for the years from 1978-79 to 1984-85. It was stated that balance sheets of the petitioner society for subsequent years were not ready. If reference is made to the income and expenditure account of the school for the year ending 31-3-1988 it would be seen that the school has collected Rs. 25,35,900. 66 as fees and has given a contribution of Rs. 17,148. 60 to the petitioner society. Again, if reference is made to the balance sheet for the year ending 31-3-1985 of the school, the school has collected over Rs. 14. 5 lakhs as fees and contributed to the petitioner society Rs. 1,00,724. 13. The amount is reflected in the balance sheet of the petitioner society as having been received from the school. Contribution of the school for the year ending 31-3-1984 to the petitioner society is Rs. 1,06,459. 50. As on 31-3-1983, the amount of contribution from the school to the petitioner society is Rs. 2,43,398. 91. It is not, therefore, that there is any contribution being made by the society for running of the school. Rather the sch
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.