SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Del) 89

MAHESH CHANDRA
PRABHA BHASIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PUNAM BAVA, RAKESH SAWHNEY, YAKESH ANAND

MAHESH CHANDRA, J

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the order dated 18th November, 1988 of Shri S. K. landon. Administrative Sub-Judge, Delhi whereby he had directed that the brothers and sisters of the deceased be also impleaded as respondents in the petition as they are necessary parties.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this petition are that Smt. Prabha Bhasin, wife of the deceased had filed an application for grant of Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in respect of the movable property left by her husband, Shri Krishan Kumar Bhasin. In the said application it was submitted that apart from the petitioner, the deceased had also left one married daughter namely Smt. Poonam Bawa as an heir and that deceased bad died intestate. in course of time said Smt. Poonam Bawa is said to have filed an affidavit bringing out that she bad no objection to the grant of Succession Certificate with regard to moveable property of her deceased father to the petitioner, Smt. Prabha Bhasin. The statement of said Prabha Bhasin was recorded as Public Witness -1. Thereafter, a supplementary statement of the said Prabha Bhasin was recorded in which it






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top