SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Del) 130

SANTOSH DUGGAL
DEVENDRA KUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.MATHUR, M.S.SIDDIQUE, NILAM GROVER, Subhash C.Bhuttan

Santosh Duggal, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the petitioners- Devendra Kumar Jain and Anurag Kumar Jain, after being served with a notice under the provisions of Section 251 of the Cr. P. C. , as accused persons for offences under section 427 read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code, in a complaint case instituted by Kapil Kumar, respondent No. 2 herein. The complaint was filed ink October, 1982, and on consideration of the allegations made in the complaint as well as preminary evidence adduced by the complainant, the magistrate came to tile conclusion that there was sufficient ground to proceed against the accused persons and, therefore, ordered their suoning to face trial under section 427/34 Indian Penal Code. After protracted proceedings on account of some applications having been moved by the accused persons, and after disposal of those applications by order dated 7th January, 1988, the magistrate eventually took up the case on 16th May, 1988, and passed order of service of notice under section 251 of Criminal Procedure Code. on the two accused persons before him to face trial for the offence under section 427134













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top