SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Del) 115

B.N.KIRPAL
PROMILA NANGIA – Appellant
Versus
BALDEV RAJ NANGIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL KHER, Ashok Kumar

B. N. Kirpal,j.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision petition filed against the order dated 12th July, 1988 whereby the Addl. District Judge, Delhi has disposed of the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act filed by the petitioner for enhancement of maintenance pendente lite.

( 2 ) THE petition for maintenance was initially filed in September, 1985 and it was directed that the petitioner should get Rs. 550. 00 as main- tenance per month. The petitioner prayed for enhancement to the extent of Rs 1000. 00.

( 3 ) THE case of the respondent before the Addl. District Judge was that after deductions he was getting a pay of Rs. 1400. 00 p. m. It was also asserted that the petitioner had inherited business from her father and she had completed her secretarial course from Y. W. C. A. in the year 1978-79 and she bad been working since then.

( 4 ) THE trial court noted that the parties did not press the application for some time. He also observed that the respondent has not been able to give the name of any institution or organisation in which the petitioner is alleged to have been working,

( 5 ) ACCORDING to the Add ). District Judge the net salary of the husband is Rs. 5055. 00 and after










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top