SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Del) 148

S.B.WAD
NARAIN DEVI – Appellant
Versus
SWARAN SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NANDITA CHANDRA, O.P.GOYAL, S.K.Paul

S. B. Wad

( 1 ) IN an accident which took place on 6. 1. 1969, Duli Chand who was travelling in tempo vehicle No. DLL 3939 died due to impact caused by truck No. PNF 4979 and also by truck No. PNE 6300. It appears from the vehicle inspection report that the front truck and the tempo struck each other head-on and the rear truck No. PNE 6300 got involved because of the impact. The Tribunal has found that there was composite negligence on the part of the front truck No. PNF 4979 and the rear truck No. PNE 6300. The Tribunal has awarded Rs. 15,440. 00 as compensation to the claimants. The claimants are the widow and five children and the father of the deceased.

( 2 ) THE Oriental Fire and Genl. Ins. Co. Ltd. with whom the rear truck No. PNE 6300 was insured has filed the cross-objection submitting that the Tribunal has not properly judged the role of the said truck only because the driver of the truck was not examined and has held that there was composite negligence of both the trucks. Counsel for the objector has submitted that the Tribunal ought to have apportioned the liability for the purpose of payment of compensation. I will dispose of the cross-objection first.

( 3 ) THE cross-ob




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top