SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Del) 162

M.K.CHAWLA
REDIHOT ELECTRICALS – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Asha Takkar, C.K.MAHAJAN, RAJIV SHARMA

M. K. Chawala, J.

( 1 ) AMONGST many others, one of the commandments of dharma is that if you borrow any money from another for a particular period then it must be returned as agreed to, but if retained beyond that period, then it should be returned with interest. This principle equally applies to the public bodies, Govt. Institutions who under the guise of the public laws recover people s moneys, later discovered to be erroneous levies, then they must return the same and at the same time compensate the citizen for the unauhorised use of his money. A similar situation has arisen in the present application.

( 2 ) THE facts being admitted need not be debated. The applicant M/s Redihot Electricals are manufacturers of domestic electrical appliances. These electrical applicances are chargeable to excise duty under tariff item No. 33-C. Ad valorem excise duty is chargeable on the value of appliances and the same is to be determined under Section 4 (a) of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

( 3 ) THE applicant had filed their list of prices of the various appliances with the excise authorities. That list stands approved. The goods were being cleared on payment of excise duty as per t




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top