M.K.CHAWLA, N.N.GOSWAMY
BALBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS order will dispose of C. Ws. 1373-75/89, 1376/89. 1378-79/89, 1377/89, 1112-13/89. 1126/89, 1281/89, 1065-71/89. 2823/88,51/89, 388/89. 907/89,903/89,945/89,965/89, 1008-9/89, 1598/88, 1252-58 89,1250/89. 894/89, 517/89, 518/89. 495/89. 545/89, 569/89, 578/89, 980-88/89,989-992/89. 2602/88, 2601/88, 2842/88, 2841/88. 2840/8u, 2813/88, 2814. /88. 2815/88. 2816/88,2817/88, 1114-1121/89, 1082-83/89, 1081/89, 1072-79/89,1386/89, 1362/89, 1380/89. Proceedings u/s 5a of the Land Acquisition Actright upto the stage of Award relating to villages, namely. Khan Pur, Deoli@ Devii. Tugbiakabad, Khirkee, Neb Sarai, Said-ula Ajaib, Tigri, Shayoorpur, Satbari, Chattar Pur, Raj Pur Khurd, Maidan Ghari, have been quashed by a Division Bench of this Court in Balak Ram Gupta v. U. O. I. C. W. P. 1639/1985 decided on 14/10/1988/l 8/11/1988. Prayer ofthe petitioners is that in spite of that Judgment, the respondents are trying totake possession of the land.
( 2 ) THE Delhi Administration as also the Delhi Development Authorityhave taken up a very fair stand before us. Their contention is that certainland owners have received compensation and as such they should not beallowed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.