LEELA SETH, P.K.BAHRI
O. P. C. JAIN – Appellant
Versus
A. D. M. (LA) – Respondent
( 1 ) RULE D. B.
( 2 ) COUNSEL for the parties pray that the matter be disposed of here and now. Consequently, we proceed to dispose of the writ petition.
( 3 ) THE main prayer in this writ petition is for a mandamus directing Sub Registrar to release the sale deed in respect of the land mentioned in the writ petition, executed and registered in favour of the petitioner without insisting on a "no objection Certificate and/or declare that no permission/ No objection Certificate is required under the provisions of Delhi Land (Restrictions on Transfer) Act, 1972.
( 4 ) THE respondent I and 3 have filed replies. Respondent No. I has conceded the position that the Khasra numbers for which No objection Certificates have been applied for are not presently notified. Respondent No. 3 has filed a reply and has admitted that five sale deeds were presented for registration vide serial nos. 31 to 35 on 22nd September, 1988, in respect of the land situated at Mehrauli, Delhi and necessary fees have been deposited.
( 5 ) MR. Rajinder Dutt, Counsel for the Respondents, points out that according to the present policy no status report/ no objection Certificate is sent to the Sub-Regis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.