SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Del) 277

LEELA SETH, P.K.BAHRI
O. P. C. JAIN – Appellant
Versus
A. D. M. (LA) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.S.VASHISHT, RAJENDER DUTT

P. K. Bahri

( 1 ) RULE D. B.

( 2 ) COUNSEL for the parties pray that the matter be disposed of here and now. Consequently, we proceed to dispose of the writ petition.

( 3 ) THE main prayer in this writ petition is for a mandamus directing Sub Registrar to release the sale deed in respect of the land mentioned in the writ petition, executed and registered in favour of the petitioner without insisting on a "no objection Certificate and/or declare that no permission/ No objection Certificate is required under the provisions of Delhi Land (Restrictions on Transfer) Act, 1972.

( 4 ) THE respondent I and 3 have filed replies. Respondent No. I has conceded the position that the Khasra numbers for which No objection Certificates have been applied for are not presently notified. Respondent No. 3 has filed a reply and has admitted that five sale deeds were presented for registration vide serial nos. 31 to 35 on 22nd September, 1988, in respect of the land situated at Mehrauli, Delhi and necessary fees have been deposited.

( 5 ) MR. Rajinder Dutt, Counsel for the Respondents, points out that according to the present policy no status report/ no objection Certificate is sent to the Sub-Regis



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top