MAHESH CHANDRA
CHOKHA NAND MADAN – Appellant
Versus
ASIAN EXHIBITORS – Respondent
( 1 ) (ORAL)-THIS Civil Revision is directed against order dated 9th December, 1988 of Sub-Judge) 1st class whereby application of decree-holder-petitioner filed under Order 21 Rule 41 Civil Procedure Code for directions to judgment-debtor to appear and disclose his assets has been dismissed. I have heard counsel for the parties and after giving my considered thought to the matter before me, I have come to the conclusion that this Civil Revision must succeed.
( 2 ) FACTS giving rise to this petition are that petitioner- decree-holder had filed an application under Order 23 Rule 41 of Civil Procedure Code for directions to judgment debtor-respondent to disclose his assets and the said application was virtually dismissed summarily by the executing court with the observations that it is the duty of the decree-holder to find out the assets of judgment- debtor to get the decretal amount recovered. The responsibility cannot be shifted upon the judgment debtor . It appears that the learned trial court has not even cared to go through the provisions of Order 21 Rule 41 of the Civil Procedure Code. , which lays down as under:-
"41. Examination of judgment-debtor as to his
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.