SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Del) 311

S.N.SAPRA
RICHARDSON VICKS IND – Appellant
Versus
VIKAS PHARMACEUTICALS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.GOHIL, ANUP SINGH, H.P.SINGH, Parag Chawla

S. N. Sapra, J.

( 1 ) ALONG with suit, for perpetual injunction for infringement of trade mark and copyright, plaintiff filed an application, being I. A. No. 4138 of 1985, under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, thereby claiming the following temporary inju. nction :

"it is humbly prayed that pending the hearing and final disposal of this suit. the defendants themselves, there servants, agents, stockists and all other persons on their behalf be restrained from using and infringing mark in relation to any vaporising ointment or any other preparation, the trade mark Vlkas s PACORUB, bottles and metal containers as per annexures e and f which is in infringement of the plaintiffs registered trade marks Nos. 328354, 328355 and 267167. The defendants may be further restrained from passing off and enabling others to pass off their vaporising ointment or other product in bottles and metal containers annexures e and f as and for that of the plaintiffs or in some ways connected with that of the plaintiffs. The Defendants may be further restrained from infringing the plaintiff s Copyright in annexures a and b . " Vide an exparte order dated 31-7-1












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top