SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Del) 369

P.N.NAG
OCEAN INVESTMENT AND FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMARJIT SINGH, ARUN MOHAN, B.P.AGRAWAL, B.P.MENON

P. N. NAG,j.

( 1 ) IN this application under Older 39 Rules I and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure in a suit for perpetual injunction the plaintiffs have prayed to restrain the defendants from interfering with or obstructing the construction being carried out by the plaintiffs on plot No. J-1906, Chittaranjan Park, New Delhi, in terms of the plans already sanctioned by the Delhi Development Authority (for short, the DDA ).

( 2 ) THE relevant facts which emerge out of the plaint are that Mr. S, M. Roy, defendant No. 4, who is a displaced person from East Pakistan, was granted the lessen rights of and plot of land measuring 371. 2 sq. metres (444 sq. yards) bearing No. J-1906 in the colony known as Chittaranjan Park. This colony was planned by the then Ministry of Worirs and Housing in consultation with the Ministry of Rehabilitation as a public policy in order to rehabilitate the persons who migrated from East Pakistan (now Bangladesh ).

( 3 ) IN 1971, Mr. S. M. Roy, defendant No. 4, after obtaining sanction carried out construction of a single storeyed residential house. It appears that defendant No. 4 was desirous of selling the aforementioned plot and he acc












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top