MAHINDER NARAIN
N. D. R. ISRANI – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this order I propose of objections of the Delhi Development Authority, to an award dated 17-7-1987.
( 2 ) TIME was taken by the Delhi Development Authority for filing affidavit evidence. No affidavit evidence has been filed. It is stated by counsel that she wishes to rely upon the record of the case before the Arbitrator, and the terms of the agreement between the parties.
( 3 ) THE objections in this petition relate to claims No. 1, 5, 9 and 10. Claim No. 1 which was raised by the contractor/petitioner, before the Arbitrator, related to making of grooves in cement plaster surface. It is contended on behalf of the respondent that these grooves have to be made before plastering. Making of grooves before plastering is impossible, as any plaster which is applied on the groove, will cover it, and it will eliminate the grooves. All the grooves on plastered surface have to be made when the plastered surface is wet. Distinct and separate activity, has to be carried out by use of implements in the shape of wooden or iron and steel battens to make the grooves. This claim has been found to be justified by the Arbitrator. 1 find no substance in the contention of the re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.