SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Del) 360

High Court Of Delhi
BALWAN - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI - Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL 151 of 1986
Decided On : 09/15/1989

Advocates Appeared:
NILAM GROVER, USHA KUMARI

The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and that Balwan's plea of alibi was not supported by any evidence.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL APPEAL - SECTION 302 IPC - MURDER - CONVICTION - EVIDENCE - EYE WITNESSES - RECOVERY OF WEAPON - BLOOD STAINS ON CLOTHES - PLEA OF ALIBI - FAIRNESS OF INVESTIGATION.

Fact of the Case:

Balwan was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Ram Chander. The prosecution alleged that Balwan intentionally caused the death of Ram Chander by inflicting injuries on him with a Pharsa. Balwan appealed against his conviction, claiming that there was interpolation in the FIR, that the natural witnesses were not examined by the prosecution, that the investigation was tainted, and that he was present on duty at the time of the incident.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was no interpolation in the FIR and that the natural witnesses were not intentionally not examined by the prosecution. The court also found that the investigation was not tainted and that Balwan was not present on duty at the time of the incident. The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and dismissed Balwan's appeal.

Issues: 1. Whether there was interpolation in the FIR. 2. Whether the natural witnesses were intentionally not examined by the prosecution. 3. Whether the investigation was tainted. 4. Whether Balwan was present on duty at the time of the incident.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that there was no interpolation in the FIR based on the testimony of the witnesses and the absence of any cross-examination on this issue. 2. The court held that the prosecution was not required to examine all possible witnesses and that the testimony of the eye witnesses was sufficient to prove the case. 3. The court held that the investigation was not tainted, despite the interpolation in the application for post-mortem examination, as this did not affect the prosecution story. 4. The court held that Balwan had not led any evidence to support his plea of alibi and that the prosecution story was corroborated by the testimony of the eye witnesses.

Final Decision: The court dismissed Balwan's appeal and upheld his conviction under Section 302 IPC.

V. B. Bansal, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal of Balwan s/o Parse r/o village Khera Khurd is directed against his conviction under S. 302 Indian Penal Code and the sentence of imprisonment for life and a fine ofrs. 50. 00 and in default of payment of fine further rigorous imprisonment for one month vide judgment and order dated 11. 9. 1986 by Sh. V. S. Aggarwal, Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi. The allegations against the appellant had been that on 4. 4. 1984 he committed murder by intentionally causing the death of Ram Chander.

( 2 ) MS. Neelam Grover has appeed for the appellant while Ms. Usha Kumar has appeared for the State. It has been submitted by Ms. Grover that there has been interpolation in the FIR inasmuch as a line was added towards the end of the statement of Karamvir in which one Ram Chander s/o Sibba r/o village Khera Khurd has been introduced as an eye witness. She has further submitted that the natural witnesses who could have been available at the place of occurrence have intentionally not been examined by the prosecution and aforesaid Ram Chander is a chance witness. She has also submitted that the investigation has not been fair and in fact was tainted inasmuch as the Investigation Officer had made interpolation in the application sent for post-mortem examination. She has also submitted that the appellant was, in fact, present on his duty at village Dubal Dham where he was working as a Chowkidar in the Forest Department and so could not possibly have committed this offence. A prayer has, therefore been made for his acquittal.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel for the State has, on the other hand, sabmitted that the appellant has not been able to lead any evidence to prove his plea of alibi and the prosecution story stands fully proved from the testimony of Karamvir and Ram Chander eye witnesses. She has further submitted that the testimony of the eye witnesses finds corroboration from the Pharsa. the weapon of offence found near the place incident and Dr. L. T. Ramani has made a categorical statement that the injuries found on the dead body of Ram Chander @ Rame (deceased) could be caused by this weapon. She has further submitted that blood was found on the clothes of the accused which he was wearing at the time of his arrest which also is a corroborative piece of evidence. In this way, the submission of the learned counsel for the State was that trial court has correctly found appellant guilty.

( 4 ) BEFORE discussing the aforesaid submissions it would be necessary to narrate the facts briefly.

( 5 ) ON 4th April, 1984 while posted at Police Station Narela ASI Udey Sing (Public Witness 5) received information and while accompanied by police officials reached the spot near Barewala field and found dead body of Ram Chander @ Rame in a pool of blood. He met Karamvir s/o Shri Ram Chander @ Rame (deceased) and recorded his statement. It was, inter alia, stated by Karamvir that he along with his family was residing in village Khera Khurd and has been agriculturist byprofession. They had sown cucumber in the aforesaid field. On that day at about 7. 30 A. M. his father had gone to the fields for removing the weeds from the fields when he had taken along with him a Khurpa. Karamvir also left his house some time later for going to the fields. He was still at a distance of 1 or 2 kilas room his own fields when he heard the cries of Bachao Bachao raised by his father who was running towards the village having Khurpa in his hand and was chased by Balwan Singh accused. At that time Balwan Singh was proclaiming that he would not leave him (Ram Chander) alive and at about 7. 00 A. M. he inflicted injuries on the right cheek and neck of Ram Chander as a result of which he fell down and died Karamvir chased Balwan Singh but was unable to apprehend him. It was also claimed by Karamvir that on account of old enmity his father was killed by Balwan Singh.

( 6 ) ASI Udey Singh made his endorsements on the statement of Karamvir and rukka was sent to po






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top