SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Del) 360

CHARANJIT TALWAR, V.B.BANSAL
BALWAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NILAM GROVER, USHA KUMARI

V. B. Bansal, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal of Balwan s/o Parse r/o village Khera Khurd is directed against his conviction under S. 302 Indian Penal Code and the sentence of imprisonment for life and a fine ofrs. 50. 00 and in default of payment of fine further rigorous imprisonment for one month vide judgment and order dated 11. 9. 1986 by Sh. V. S. Aggarwal, Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi. The allegations against the appellant had been that on 4. 4. 1984 he committed murder by intentionally causing the death of Ram Chander.

( 2 ) MS. Neelam Grover has appeed for the appellant while Ms. Usha Kumar has appeared for the State. It has been submitted by Ms. Grover that there has been interpolation in the FIR inasmuch as a line was added towards the end of the statement of Karamvir in which one Ram Chander s/o Sibba r/o village Khera Khurd has been introduced as an eye witness. She has further submitted that the natural witnesses who could have been available at the place of occurrence have intentionally not been examined by the prosecution and aforesaid Ram Chander is a chance witness. She has also submitted that the investigation has not been fair and in fact was tainted inasmuch as the Investig


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top