SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Del) 400

MAHINDER NARAIN
REGENCY INDUSTRIES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
KEDAR BUILDERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.GOHIL, Anil Singh, ANUP SINGH, H.P.SINGH, KALPANA GUPTA, MANMOHAN SINGH, N.K.ANAND

Mahinder Narain, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has filed the suit for permanent injunction, seeking to restrain the defendant, their servants, agents, representatives, dealers and all other persons from dealing in real estate and construction business or any other business under the name REGENCY Estate, or any other name identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiff s. name/mark REGENCY- The plaintiff has moved the interim application bearing I. A. No. 5570 of 1989, in this matter, and by this order, I propose to deal with the said interim application.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff asserts that Regency Industries Ltd. is the current name of the plaintiff, and that initially the plaintiff was incorporated on 9-7-1984 under the name and style M/s. Regency Apartments India (P) Ltd. , and thereafter changed its corporate name to M/s. Regency properties Ltd. in the year 1985, and once again changed its name to the present name M/s. Regency Industries Ltd. in the year 1987. The plaintiff asserts that it is carrying on. since 1984, the business of real estate and construction business, as also other business activities. It is asserted in para 5 of the plaint that a number of commercial/residential com
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top