CHARANJIT TALWAR, V.B.BANSAL
SUNDER LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent
( 1 ) THE appellants herein Vinod Kumar, son of Subedar Sing Rajesh Kumar, son of Madan Mohan and Sunder Lal, son of Nawab Singh have been convicted for the offence punishable tinder Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penaj Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life, They have further been convicted for the offencs under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fins of Rs. 500. 00. in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonmen for three months. The sentences of imprisonment Were, how ever directed to run concurrently.
( 2 ) ALONGWITH these three appellants another accusced viz. . Sunder Lal son of Kherati Lal had also been tried. The pro secution case as laid before the trial court was that on 16th July, 1981 at about 7. 30 p. m. the four accused abducted Kirpa Shankar, who had been entrusted with 43 gold bangles by his employer M/s. Nathumal and Sons, Jewellers of Chandni Chowk and forced him to accompany them in a three-wheeler scooter. The scooter was driven to a lonely spot on tlie ring road where after robbing him of the bangle
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.