SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Del) 444

High Court Of Delhi
C.L.JAIN - Appellant
Versus
GOPI CHAND - Respondent
Interim Application 3985 of 1989
Decided On : 12/08/1989

Advocates Appeared:
B.S.MANN, M.S.Mann, O.N.Vohra

The court has the discretion to order the deposit of the balance consideration amount in court under Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act to ensure that it is readily available to the defendant upon completion of the contract.

Headnote:

SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE - AGREEMENT TO SELL - DEPOSIT OF BALANCE CONSIDERATION - SECTION 16 OF THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT - COURT'S DISCRETION - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION - SELLER'S READINESS TO PERFORM - PRICE ESCALATION - INTEREST ON DEPOSITED AMOUNT - PROTECTION OF PARTIES' INTERESTS.

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell land. The defendant initially contested the suit but later expressed willingness to perform his part of the bargain. The plaintiff had paid a part of the sale consideration in cash through his representative.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the case was unusual as the defendant was willing to perform the contract. However, the court considered it necessary to direct the plaintiff to deposit the entire balance consideration in court to ensure that it would be readily available to the defendant upon completion of the contract.

Issues: 1. Whether the court should exercise its discretion under Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act to order the deposit of the balance consideration amount in court. 2. Whether the seller should benefit from price escalation due to the time taken in completing statutory requirements.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that it had the discretion to order the deposit of the balance consideration amount in court under Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act. 2. The court opined that it would be unfair if only the buyer was tied down to a price in the bargain while the seller could benefit from price escalation due to no fault of the seller. By ordering the deposit of the balance consideration amount in court, both parties would be placed in an equal situation as the money deposited would earn interest.

Final Decision: The court directed the plaintiff to deposit the balance consideration amount of Rs. 22,57,690.00 in court within one month. The court also clarified that this order did not adjudicate on the matter of payments allegedly made by the plaintiff to the defendant.

MAHINDER NARAIN

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has filed Suit No. 1385 of 1989 for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 7-10-1988, by which 1/3rd out of land measuring 62 bighas 1 biswa, situated in village Bijwasan, Tehsil Mehrauli, New Delhi, was agreed to be sold. According to this agreement, the amount which was payable was at the rate of Rs. 5,05,000. 00 per acre. According to the plaintiff, a total Sum of Rs. 25,07,690,. 00 was payable as a total sale consideration.

( 2 ) IT is asserted that some money has been paid in part to the defendant.

( 3 ) I had got the statement of the plaintiff and the defendant recorded in Court on 1-11-1989. According to the statement recorded, the plaintiff had never seen the defendant, but had paid cash money through his representative on various occasions, totalling Rs. 2,50,000. 00. All these moneys were paid on different dates by cash. This money was paid through Sukhbir Singh, who was also examined in Court.

( 4 ) STATEMENT of the defendant, Gopi Chand, was also recorded in Court. He stated that he was prepared to sell his land to the plaintiff on receiving the money due under the agreement dated 7-10-1988.

( 5 ) DEDUCTING the amount of Rupees 2,50,000. 00 which has been received by Gopi Chand, defendant, the balance amount receivable by him from the plaintiff is Rupees 22,57,690. 00

( 6 ) IN my view, this case has taken an unusual turn after filing of the written statement by the defendant, when he made a statement that he is ready and willing to perform his part of the bargain, i. e. to sell the land in question. In pursuant to the statement made in Court, it is not disputed that the Gopi Chand has also executed applications which are required to be executed by him under the provisions of S. 269 (UC) of the Income-tax Act, to get the clearance from the authorities concerned. He has also signed the application under the provisions of the Delhi Lands (Restriction on Transfer) Act, 1972, to obtain permission from the authorities concerned. Both these applications are now, the plaintiff states, with the authorities concerned.

( 7 ) I find the instant case to be a rare case, it does not happen often that the defendant agrees to do and perform his part of the bargain, that will conclude the suit.

( 8 ) AT the same time, in view of the provisions of Sec. 16 of the Specific Relief Act, I consider it necessary and desirable that in this case the plaintiff be directed to deposit the entire balance consideration in this Court so that the same can be easily and readily available to the defendant at the time the contract is performed by execution of sale- deed, and by taking such further actions, as may be necessary.

( 9 ) MR. Mann has brought to my notice AIR 1928 Privy Council 208, Ardeshir H. Mama v. Flora Sassoon, in which judgment at page 216, it is stated that readiness and willingness to perform the contract has to be "continuous readiness and willingness, from the date of the contract to the time of the hearing, to perform the contract on his part. Failure to make good that averment brought with it the inevitable dismissal of his suit".

( 10 ) IN my opinion, it would be very unfair if only the buyer is tied down to a price in the bargain, and the seller is unable to benefit by price escalation, if due to no fault of the seller time is taken in completion of statutory requirements. In my view, by ordering the deposit of the balance consideration amount in this Court, both the parties will be placed in an equal situation, as it will be possible for the money deposited to earn interest. In case the sale consideration is ultimately ordered to be handed over to the defendant, as he has to specifically perform the contract, he will have in addition to the interest accrued also. Equally, the money which is put in fixed deposit when ordered to be paid to the plaintiff, in the event of the failure of the suit, will be returned with interest. Both the parties interest will be safeguarded by order









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top