SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 29

B.N.KIRPAL
JAIN RUBBER INDUSTRIES – Appellant
Versus
CROWN PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANUP SINGH, H.P.SINGH, V.P.Ghiraya

B. N. Kirpal

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 for grant of ad interim injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark. "crown" in respect; of the tooth picks which are being manufactured and sold by the defendants.

( 2 ) THE case of the plaintiff is that it is a registered proprietor of the trade mark CROWN in respect of tooth picks This registration was granted in 1986 with effect from 10th September, 1980 It is further alleged that the plaintiff has been using the trade mark Crown since January, 1980 According to the plaintiff, the defendants have started using the trade mark Crown in respect of tooth picks on or after December, 1980,t The plaintiff, therefore, prays that as it is the proprietor of the trade mark Crown, the defendants should be restrained from using the said mark.

( 3 ) ON behalf of the defendants, it has been contended that the defendants have adopted the mark Crown in respect of tooth picks when in 1977 they had applied to the Government of West Bengal for grant of provisional registration for manufacturing round wooden tooth picks. The machinery for the said 229 tooth picks was imported in the year 1980 and according to the d





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top