SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 15

N.N.GOSWAMY
SUSHILA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
A. C. JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Arvind Minocha, G.N.AGGARWAL, L.R.GUPTA, R.S.NARULA, Uma Jain

N. N. Goswamy, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition under Section 25b (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, by the tenants is directed against the eviction order dated 10-9-1984 passed by the Additional Rent Controller, Delhi.

( 2 ) THE landlords had sought eviction on the ground of personal bonafide requirement. In paragraph 18 (a) of the petition it was alleged :-

"1. The petitioner No. I is the owner and landlord and petitioner No. 2 has been held to be landlord of the premises in question. The premises in the occupation of the respondents are bonafidely required by the petitioner No. I for use as a residence for himself, his wife Smt. Rachna Jain and his daughter who are dependent on him. 2. He has no other accommodation (residential/non-residential) in Delhi or outside Delhi, muchless reasonable suitable accommodation. 3. At present, petitioner No. I and his family are living in one room and a small store-cum-kitchen provided by Shri Areh Dass Jain who is also not having sufficient accommodation. 4. Besides, the predecessors of petitioners and respondents 9 to 11 are/have been old residents of Delhi and as such they have very wide social connections in Delhi and outside Delhi. Fr







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top