SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 60

B.N.KIRPAL
BOMBAY OIL INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
BALLARPUR INDUSTRIES LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.Gumashta, S.K.Chawla

B. N. KTRPAL, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) THIS order will dispose of I. A. No. 177/88, being an application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 CPC filed by the plaintiff; I. A. No. 416/88 being an application under Order 39, Rule 4 Civil Procedure Code filed by defendant No. 1; and I. A. No. 1298/88, being an application under Section 151 Civil Procedure Code filed by the plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff had filed a suit alleging that its registered trade mark "saffola" has been infringed by the defendant. According to the averments in the plaint, the plaintiff is the owner of the registered trade mark "saffola" in respect of edible oil. This registration was applied for on 17th October 1961. This registration was granted. The plaintiff also applied on 28th August 1964 and obtained another registration for the word "saffola" in respect of Kardi Oil. A third registration which was obtained was of the label consisting of two horizontal labels similar to the earlier label, but with the addition of a device of heart. According to the plaintiff it is selling edible oil in Delhi and other places in India in a tin which has yellow background with grooves in the upper and lower parts of the tin. The allegatio



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top