SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 119

P.K.BAHRI
DHARAM DEV – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.R.LAL, S.L.HANS, SANJIV KUMAR

P. K. BAHRI, J

( 1 ) A preliminary objection has been raised by the learned counsel for the respondents that the High Court has no jurisdiction to decide this writ petition.

( 2 ). The petitioner in this petition brought under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has sought mandamus requiring the respondents to allot the Railway Quarter to the petitioner on over-riding priority basis so that the petitioner may be able to vacate the accommodation allotted to him from the Central Pool by the Railway Board and for also direction to the Directorate of Fstates not to evict the petitioner from the present accommdation and requiring the petitioner to pay the penal rent in respect of the said accommodation till alternative accommodation is provided to the petitioner by the Northern Railway.

( 3 ). The petitioner is an employee of Northern Railway admitted and had been allotted a quarter by the Northern. Railway earlier and later on he went on deputation to Railway Board and he vacated the Railway Quarter and was allotted the oresent accommodation bearing Quarter No. 151 Sector-XII ai R. K. Puram from the general pool maintained by Directorate of Estates at the instance of Railway Board




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top