SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 107

C.L.CHAUDHRY
CAMLIN PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL PENCIL INDUSTRIES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HEMANT SINGH, K.L.AGARWAL, N.K.ANAND, R.K.AGARWAL

C. L. Chandbry, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has preferred this suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from manufacturing, selling offering for sale or dealing, in the pencils bearing the distinctive floral design, colour combination, lay out and arrangement of artistic features of the plaintiff s pencil FLORA and from reproducing the floral design, colour combination, lay out and arrangement of artistic features of the cartons pertaining to the their FLORA pencils and from doing any other thing as is likely to infringe the plaintiff s copyright in respect of its FLORE pencil cartons and also restraining the defendants from maufacturing, selling or dealing in pencils under the trade mark FLORE or any other mark as is identical to and/or deceptively similar with the trade mark FLORA of the plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE case of the plaintiff as set up in the plaint, is that the plaintiff is one of the lagest manufacturers of art and stationery materials and is exclusively marketing the goods of its manufacture for the last 40 years and one of the famous products of the plaintiff is its Camlin FLORA pencils which are highly distinctive and are manufactured and sold in distinctive a















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top