SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 124

D.P.WADHWA
PRADIP KUMAR KAPUR – Appellant
Versus
SBAILJA KAPOOR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.PURI, S.M.Sarin

D. P. Wadhwa, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is of the order dated 1-2-1988 passed by the Additional District Judge, Delhi, whereby she, on an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for shore the Act ) of the wife. allowed her maintenance pendente lite at the rate of Rs. 600. 00 per month, but at the same time declining her any expenses of the proceedings. The petitioner is the husband before me.

( 2 ) THE parties were married on 12-10-1986. They lived together for about three months. Then the wife filed a petition under Section 12 of the Act seeking annulment of the marriage on the ground that the marriage had not been consummated owing to impotence of the husband. In these proceedings, she filed an application on 10-3-1987 under Section 24 of the Act claiming both maintenance pendente lite and litigation expenses but, as noted above, her application was allowed to the extent that she was awarded maintenance pendente lite at the rate of Rs. 600. 00 per month from the date of the application but the court below held that she was not entitled to any litigation expenses she being herself an earning hand.

( 3 ) THE husband is working as a junior accountant (not junior







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top