SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 104

CHARANJIT TALWAR, M.K.CHAWLA
MOHAMMAD HABIB – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.S.AHLUVALIA, M.S.SIDDIQUE

Charanjit Talwar, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant, Mohd. Habib, was convicted for the offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, for having committed rape on a minor girl, Aruna Kumari, on 19th August 1980 at about 2. 00 p m. He was sentenced to life imprisonment. He has also been convicted for the offence under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500. 00. In default of payment of fine, he has been directed to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months. The appellant challenges the legality of the judgment dated 11th October 1983, holding him guilty of the above mentioned charges, and also the order of the same date sentencing him.

( 2 ) THE central point to be noticed in this appeal is that the medical evidence falsifies the evidence of the two eye witnesses as well as of the prosecutrix. The appellant, aged 21 years, is alleged to have been arrested at the spot. He was medically examined by Dr. Suresh Kumar of the Police Hospital, Delhi, at 8. 35 p. m. on the date of the incident. The medico-legal certificate is Exhibit PA. As the genuineness of this certificate was admitted by the ap























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top