SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 95

CHARANJIT TALWAR, M.K.CHAWLA
LALA RAM AND THAKUR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.R.Sethi, M.Salim, P.N.Kohli, Rama Sahni, SALIM SIDDIQUI

M. K. Chawla, J.

( 1 ) BY this Judgment, we propose to dispose of two connected criminal appeals bearing No. 116/84 filed by Lala Ram and 0m Parkash, and criminal appeal No. 131/84, filed by Thakur Singh. These appeals arise out of the order of Shri T. S. Oberoi, Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi. , dated 1st May, 1984. by which they were held guilty of offences under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to imprisonment for life, Accused Thakur Singh and Lala Ram were also sentenced to R. 1. for a period of 3 years for the offence punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

( 2 ) IN order to appreciate th arguments raised by the appellants, it is necessary to keep in mind the prosecution version of the incident. Few days prior to the present occurrence, a quarrel had taken place between Padam Singh (deceased) and the accused persons. With the intervention of the father and brother of Padam Singh, the dispute was amicably settled. However, on 9th February, 1982, at about 4. 15 P. M. as the story goes, when Padam Singh was passing through Gali No. 4, Than Singh Nagar, and was near the back portion of
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top