SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 175

B.N.KIRPAL
RANBAXY LABORATORIES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DUA PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANUP SINGH, B.I.SINGH, MANMOHAN SINGH

B. N. Kirpal

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has filed a suit alleging that its registered trade mark "calmpose" has been infringed by the defendant, who is manufacturing similar medicine and marketing under the mark of "calmprose". The prayer in the suit is for a perpetual injunction and for a decree for rendition of accounts.

( 2 ) ALONG with the plaint the plaintiff has also filed an application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 Civil Procedure Code and has prayed for an ad interim injunction. It is averred that the plaintiff has had the trade mark registered since 6th March 1970 and has sold "calmpose" worth about Rs. 40. 16 crores since its adoption and has spent about Rs. 16. 43 lakhs on sales promotion from January to August, 1987. The said medicine are Diazepam tablets of 5 mg each. It is also contended that not only is the mark of the defendant phonetically and visually similar, but even the packing of the defendant of the said medicine is similar to that of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is using two colours, namely, silver and brown and the packing is done in aluminium foil on one side and polythene film on the other ; and the packing of the defendant is similar to that of the plaintiff.

(







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top