( 1 ) THIS civil revision has been brought under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act challenging the eviction order dated November 5, 1985, passed by Shri G. D. Dhanuka, Additional Rent Controller, on the ground of bona fide requirement for residence covered by clause (e) of sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act.

( 2 ) MR. R K. Aggarwal, counsel appearing for the petitioner-tenant, has challenged this eviction order only on one point that the finding of the Additional Rent Controller that the premises had been let out to the petitioner-tenant for residential purpose only is perverse and so, the same should be set aside. The findings of the Additional Rent Controller that the respondent is the landlord-owner of the premises in question and the said premises are required by him for occupation as residence and also for his family members dependent upon him and he is not in possession of any reasonably alternative suitable residential accommodation, aie not challenged before me.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the case set up in the petition, the premises let out to the tenant are residential while the tenant pleaded that in fact, the premises had been le