SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 275

P.K.BAHRI
JAGDISH CHANDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.NAYAR, JITENDER CHAWLA, SUDHA SRIVASTAVA, SUNIL MALHOTRA

P. K. BAHRI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been brought against order dated December 17, 1982, of the District Judge, Delhi, by which he had dismissed the objection petition filed by the appellant under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, for annulment and revocation of letters of administration already granted in favour of respondent No. 2-Inderjit Marwah on the basis of a will allegedly executed by Hakumat Rai. The appellant was held to be having no locus standi to challenge the letters of administration granted in favour of respondent No. 2.

( 2 ) ADMITTEDLY, the appellant is a tenant in a portion of house No. 10/2461, Beadon Pura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. Hakumat Rai and his wife had brought an eviction case against the appellant on the ground of bona fide requirement for residence but they remained unsuccessful in that effort upto the High Court. After the death of his wife, Hakumat Rai is stated to have brought another eviction case against the appellant in which he pleaded that his wife had executed a will in his favour. The ground of eviction set up again was bona fide requirement for residence. The Additional Rent Controller negatived the said ground giving the findin












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top