SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 316

D.P.WADHWA
KAPUR CHAND – Appellant
Versus
DELHI ADMINSTRATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.JAIN, A.S.CHANDHIOK, H.S.PARIHAR, S.P.SRIVASTAVA

D. P. Wadhwa, J.

( 1 ) THE principal question that arises for decision in this writ petition is if a driver and a conductor of a school bus are employees within the meaning of Section 2 (h) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (for short the Act ) and, if so, whether they are entitled to salaries, allowances and other prescribed benefits, if any, as required under Section 10 of the Act. Under Section 2 (h) of the Act, an employee means a teacher and includes every other employee working in a recognised school. Section 10 of the Act reads as under :-

" (1) The scales of pay and allowances, medical facilities, pension, gratuity, provident fund and other prescribed benefits of the employees of a recognised private school shall not be less than those of the employees of the corresponding status in schools run by the appropriate authority : Provided that where the scales of pay and allowances, medical facilities, pension, gratuity, provident fund and other prescribed benefits of the employees of any recognised private school are less than those of the employees of the corresponding status in the schools run by the appropriate authority, the appropriate authority shall direct, in wr
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top