SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 313

S.B.WAD
SHIELA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
JAGIR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.R.SABHARWAL, O.P.GOYAL

S. B. Wad

( 1 ) OM Parkash, whose widow and daughter have filed this appeal for enhancement of compensation, died on 5th February, 1966, near Kela Godown, Qutab Road, in a road accident caused by truck No. MPH 6094. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 24,580. 00 towards compensation payable by respondent No. 3, the insurance company.

( 2 ) THE cross-objection is filed by respondent No. 2, the owner of the truck and respondent No. 3, the insurance company. They have filed a joint written statement, challenging the award on merits and also raising a plea of contributory negligence. It is strange that a common written statement is being filed by the respondent No. 2 as well as by the insurance company. This is because the insurance company is not entitled to raise any plea on merits and has to honour the award passed on merits against the owner under section 96 of the Motor Vehicles Act. At the time of the hearing the counsel appearing for the said respondent could not justify the pleas raised in the cross-objections. Counsel was fair enough not to press them. Therefore, the cross-objections filed by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are rejected.

( 3 ) OM Parkash was 29 years old at the r



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top