P.K.BAHRI
H. S. TREOBAN – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN KOKOKU WIRE LIMITED – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS civil revision has been brought under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act against order dated November 1986, of Shri J. M. Malik, Rent Controller, Delhi, by which he had dismissed the eviction petition brought by the petitioner on the ground of eviction covered by Clause (e) of Sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act (for short the Act ).
( 2 ) THE facts that there exists relationship of landlord tenant between the parties and that premises comprising of the ground floor of house No. D-293, Defence Colony, New Delhi, having been let out to the respondent for residential purpose only and that petitioner-landlord is the owner of the property in question are not disputed before me. The Controller had negatived the ground of bonafide requirement for residence on the ground that the landlord and his family members are in possession of reasonably suitable alternate accommodation and the landlord does not bonafide require the demised premises for occupation as residence for himself or for any family members dependent upon him. These findings of the Controller have been challenged by the landlord.
( 3 ) AS per averments in the pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.