SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 320

P.K.BAHRI
H. S. TREOBAN – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN KOKOKU WIRE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Bhasin, R.K.Anand, S.D.SHARMA, Sunita Harish

P. K. Bahri, J.

( 1 ) THIS civil revision has been brought under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act against order dated November 1986, of Shri J. M. Malik, Rent Controller, Delhi, by which he had dismissed the eviction petition brought by the petitioner on the ground of eviction covered by Clause (e) of Sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act (for short the Act ).

( 2 ) THE facts that there exists relationship of landlord tenant between the parties and that premises comprising of the ground floor of house No. D-293, Defence Colony, New Delhi, having been let out to the respondent for residential purpose only and that petitioner-landlord is the owner of the property in question are not disputed before me. The Controller had negatived the ground of bonafide requirement for residence on the ground that the landlord and his family members are in possession of reasonably suitable alternate accommodation and the landlord does not bonafide require the demised premises for occupation as residence for himself or for any family members dependent upon him. These findings of the Controller have been challenged by the landlord.

( 3 ) AS per averments in the pet








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top