SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 347

D.P.WADHWA, R.N.PYNE
GURMAUJ SARAN BALUJA – Appellant
Versus
JOYCE C. SALIM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANAND KUMAR, B.K.SUD, D.S.Narula, M.L.VARMA, Nitin Nayar, SURESH SINGH

D. P. Wadhwa, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the plaintiff is directed against the order dated 26-10-1987 of the learned single Judge allowing an application of one Kaka Singh filed under Order 1, Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short the Code ), for impleading him as a defendant in the suit.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff on l0-5-1983 filed a suit for specific performance of two agreements and, in the alternative, for recovery of Rs. l3,74,000. 00 as damages against four defendants. He had entered into these two agreements with the first defendant, who is the wife of the second defendant. The plaintiff contended that defendant No. 1, being the owner of plots Nos. 452a and 452b in Block S, Greater Kailash, Part II, New Delhi, entered into two separate agreements to sell these two plots to the plaintiff for certain consideration and also received earnest money of Rs. 15,000. 00 each in respect of these two plots from the plaintiff. Both these agreements were entered into in March 1972, one on 15-3-1972 and the other on 27-3-1972. The third and the fourth defendants were described as developers of the colony in which these two plots are situated. At the time wh





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top