SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Del) 362

High Court Of Delhi
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED - Appellant
Versus
N.P.TYAGI - Respondent
First Appeal Order 52 of 1988
Decided On : 12/05/1988

Advocates Appeared:
J.R.MIDHA, N.K.Sangle

Headnote:Motor Vehicles Act - Section 92-A — In case where the transfer of ownership of a vehicle is not proved, as the registration is still in the name of the original owner, bat the insurance policy subsisted when, the accident took place, then the Insurance Company cannot escape liability.

M. K. Chawla,j.

( 1 ) BY this order, I purpose to dispose of four connected appeals bearing Nos. F. A. O. 52/88 to F. A. O. 55/88, filed by New India Assurance Company Limited, against the respondents m the respective appeals, as common questions of law and fact arise for determination. The appellant has challenged the correctness of the order of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dated 9-11-1987 whereby the appellant herein was directed to pay the interim compensation of Rs. 15,000. 00 under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act to the respondents in the appeals. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that an order under Section 92a of the Motor Vehicles Act cannot be passed unless and until the owner of the offending vehicle admits the accident with the other vehicle. His alternative plea is that assuming for the sake of arguments that such an order can be passed, then in that case Shri Subhash Chand, the transferee of the vehicle insured with the company, be made liable to pay and not the insurance company.

( 2 ). I do not find any substance in the arguments of the learned counsel for the appellant, Shri Prem Kumar was the registered owner of truck/tempo No. DHL 8938. He had insured his vehicle with the New India Assurance Company Ltd. This vehicle met with an accident as a result of which four persons died. The L. Rs. andthe dependant of the victims filed claim petitions under Section 110a of the Motor Vehicles Act, claiming various amounts of compensation on account of accidental death of their nears and dears. The parties admit the factum of the accident which had taken place during the subsistence of the insurance policy.

( 3 ). Learned counsel for the appellant pointed out some of the documents showing that during the period of insurance. Prem Kumar had transferred the vehicle to Subhash Chand which automatically resulted in the cessation of the liability of the insurer. This very question is the subject-matter of an issue before the Accidents Claims Tribunal. The parties have yet to lead evidence to substantiate this assertion. As at present advised, Shri Prem Kumar must be held to be the registered owner of the vehicle which met with anaccident, and which was insured with the appellant company. For the purpose of payment of interim compensation, under Section 92 of the Act, prima facie, the insurance company (the appellant herein) cannot escape the liability. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, in my opinion, was justified in directing the New India Assurance Company Ltd. , to pay the interim compensation of Rs. 15,000. 00 to the respondents within one month from the date of the order failing which to pay interest at the rate of 12% p. a. thereon.

( 4 ). There is no force in the appeal and the same is hereby dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top