SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Del) 283

R.N.AGGARWAL
KAUSHALYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.P.Lao, S.C.SINGHA

Aggarwal J

( 1rule DB )

( 2 ) BY. means of this writ petition under Article 226 of of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Kaushalya has challenged the legality of the order dated 25th June, 1987 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, South District, New Delhi, externing her under section 47 of the Delhi Police Act (hereinafter for the. sake of brevity called the Act ) from the Union Territory of Delhi for a period of two years.

( 3 ) THE relevant facts are that on 11th September, 1985 the Station House Officer, Delhi Cantt. sent a proposal to the Deputy Commissioner of Police, South District for externment of the petitioner under section 48 (f) of the Act. it was stated in the proposal that the petitioner who is a resident of RZ-326, Brahampuri Pankha Road, New Delhi, is a known bootlegger and is a habitual seller of illicit liquor, charas, heroin, etc. and that she had been twice convicted for offences under section 61 (1) 14 of the Punjab Excise Act and is involved in a number of cases as per the details given therein. It was further stated that the petitioner is a bad character of the police station and is a history sheeter and her name is borne in bundle A. It is fu






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top