SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Del) 493

C.L.CHAUDHRY
SHARP L. P. G. PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SEIKO ENGINEERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.L.AGARWAL, P.P.JUNEJA, R.K.AGARWAL

C. L. Chaudhry

( 1 ) THE Plaintiff in this suit claims a decree for perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing, selling or otherwise dealing in electronic mosquito repellent/destroyer under the trade mark SEIKO or any other trade mark identical and/or deceptively similar to plaintiff s trade mark SEIKO and for perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from passing off their electronic mosquito repellent/destroyers etc which may be identical and/or deceptively similar to the plaintiff s trade mark SEIKO on the following allegations made in the plaint :- That since the year 1986 (20. 2. 1986) the plaintiff has been carrying on the business of manufacturing and marketing of electronic mosquito repellant/ destroyers. The plaintiff has been using the trade mark SEIKO for their electronic mosquito repellant/destroyers. An application has been filed for registration of the said trade mark SEIKO before the Registrar of trade marks and the same is likely to be allowed in due course of time. The plaintiff has given wide publicity to its trade mark SEIKO and the said products under the said trade mark SEIKO connote and denote the goods and merchandise of the plainti












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top